4.7 Article

The validity of the time-lag method for the characterization of mixed-matrix membranes

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 618, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118715

Keywords

Time-lag method; Mixed-matrix membranes; Impermeable particles; Three-dimensional modelling; Effective diffusivity coefficient

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Canada [04443]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time-lag method is commonly used for characterizing gas separation membranes, allowing determination of diffusion, permeability, and solubility coefficients from a single dynamic gas permeation experiment. This paper focuses on the applicability of the method for theoretical mixed-matrix membranes through numerical simulations, estimating effective diffusion coefficient from time lag.
The time-lag method is commonly used for the characterization of gas separation membranes. It allows the determination of the diffusion, permeability, and solubility coefficients from a single dynamic gas permeation experiment. This method is widely used for any membrane material, including glassy polymers, polymers with intrinsic microporosity, and mixed-matrix membranes. However, it is understood that for such determined transport coefficients, it is effective rather than intrinsic parameters that are estimated. In this paper, we focus on the applicability of the time-lag method for the characterization of theoretical mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs), in which impermeable particles of different shapes are ideally dispersed in a continuous polymer phase. Dynamic gas permeation experiments were simulated by solving the three-dimensional Fick's second law of diffusion numerically. The generated data allowed the estimation of the effective diffusion coefficient from the time lag and the ratio of the effective permeability and solubility coefficients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available