4.4 Article

Physician agency, consumerism, and the consumption of lower-limb MRI scans

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102427

Keywords

Provider prices; Shopping; Price transparency; Vertical integration; Agency

Funding

  1. Common wealth Fund
  2. National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation
  3. Arnold Ventures
  4. University of Toulouse
  5. Jameel Poverty Action Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that privately insured patients often opt for high-priced MRI providers over lower-priced options, with referring physicians playing a significant role in determining the location of care. Referrer fixed effects explain a much larger share of the variance in MRI scan prices compared to patient cost-sharing, patient characteristics, or patients' home HRR fixed effects. Patients generally need to deviate from physicians' established referral patterns to access lower-cost providers.
We study where privately insured individuals receive planned MRI scans. Despite significant out-of-pocket costs for this undifferentiated service, privately insured patients often receive care in high-priced locations when lower priced options were available. The median patient in our data has 16 MRI providers within a 30-minute drive of her home. On average, patients bypass 6 lower-priced providers between their homes and their actual treatment locations. Referring physicians heavily influence where patients receive care. The share of the variance in the prices of patients' MRI scans that referrer fixed effects (52 percent) explain is dramatically greater than the share explained by patient cost-sharing (< 1 percent), patient characteristics (< 1 percent), or patients' home HRR fixed effects (2 percent). In order to access lower cost providers, patients must generally diverge from physicians' established referral patterns. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available