4.3 Article

On graphs with no induced five-vertex path or paraglider

Journal

JOURNAL OF GRAPH THEORY
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 305-323

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22656

Keywords

chromatic number; clique number; P-5-free graphs

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11801284]
  2. DST-SERB-MATRICS, Goverment of India [MTR/2018/000288]
  3. Natural Sciexnce Foundation of Tianjin [20JCYBJC01190]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper investigates the structure of (P-5, paraglider)-free graphs, establishing a relationship between the chromatic number and clique number. It also characterizes graphs that satisfy certain conditions and shows the optimality of the upper bound. Additionally, it concludes that there is no (3/2-epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the chromatic number of (P-5, paraglider)-free graphs for any epsilon>0.
Given two graphs H-1 and H-2, a graph is (H-1,H-2)-free if it contains no induced subgraph isomorphic to H-1 or H-2. For a positive integer t, P-t is the chordless path on t vertices. A paraglider is the graph that consists of a chorless cycle C-4 plus a vertex adjacent to three vertices of the C-4. In this paper, we study the structure of (P-5, paraglider)-free graphs, and show that every such graph G satisfies chi(G) <= [ 3/2 omega(G)], where chi(G) and omega(G) are the chromatic number and clique number of G, respectively. Our bound is attained by the complement of the Clebsch graph on 16 vertices. More strongly, we completely characterize all the (P-5, paraglider)-free graphs G that satisfies chi(G) > 3/2 omega(G). We also construct an infinite family of (P-5, paraglider)-free graphs such that every graph G in the family has chi(G) = [3/2 omega(G)] -1. This shows that our upper bound is optimal up to an additive constant and that there is no (3/2-epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the chromatic number of (P-5, paraglider)-free graphs for any epsilon>0.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available