4.3 Article

Performance of self-collected penile-meatal swabs compared to clinician-collected urethral swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium by nucleic acid amplification assays

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 131-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.07.018

Keywords

Chlamydia trachomatis; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Trichomonas vaginalis; Mycoplasma genitalium; Self-collection; Penile-meatal swabs; Acceptability

Funding

  1. NIBIB, NIH [U54EB007958]
  2. NIH, NIAID [U01068613-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Men were enrolled in a study to assess the performance and acceptability of self-collected penile meatal swabs as compared to clinician-collected urethral swabs for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We expected penile-meatal swabs to perform favorably to urethral swabs for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) detection by nucleic acid amplification assays (NAATs). Of 203 swab pairs tested; for CT, penile-meatal swab sensitivity was 96.8% and specificity was 98.8%. NG sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 98.9%, respectively. For TV, sensitivity was 85.0% and specificity was 96.7%. For MG sensitivity and specificity were 793% and 99.4%, respectively. No significant statistical differences between sample type accuracy (CT: P = 0.625; NG: P = 0.248; TV: P = 0.344; and MG: P = 0.070) existed. Most men, 90.1%, reported self-collection of penile-meatal swabs as Very Easy or Easy. Self-collected penile-meatal swabs appeared acceptable for NAAT STI detection and an acceptable collection method by men. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available