4.7 Article

Adoption of Active Surveillance for Very Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in the United States: A National Survey

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages E1728-E1737

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa942

Keywords

thyroid cancer; active surveillance; surveillance; microcarcinoma; survey; thyroid cancer

Funding

  1. UW Carbone Cancer Center
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K08CA230204]
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]
  4. NIH/NCI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to understand factors associated with the adoption of active surveillance (AS) for thyroid cancer. Results showed that nonadopters were less likely to work in academic settings, see a high number of thyroid cancer patients, be aware of AS, use applicable guidelines, have resources or motivation for AS, while adopters were more likely to have awareness, resources, and motivation for AS.
Context: Active surveillance (AS) of thyroid cancer with serial ultrasounds is a newer management option in the United States. Objective: This work aimed to understand factors associated with the adoption of AS. Methods: We surveyed endocrinologists and surgeons in the American Medical Association Masterfile. To estimate adoption, respondents recommended treatment for 2 hypothetical cases appropriate for AS. Established models of guideline implementation guided questionnaire development. Outcome measures included adoption of AS (nonadopters vs adopters, who respectively did not recommend or recommended AS at least once; and partial vs full adopters, who respectively recommended AS for one or both cases). Results: The 464 respondents (33.3% response) demographically represented specialties that treat thyroid cancer. Nonadopters (45.7%) were significantly (P < .001) less likely than adopters to practice in academic settings, see more than 25 thyroid cancer patients/year, be aware of AS, use applicable guidelines (P = .04), know how to determine whether a patient is appropriate for AS, have resources to perform AS, or be motivated to use AS. Nonadopters were also significantly more likely to be anxious or have reservations about AS, be concerned about poor outcomes, or believe AS places a psychological burden on patients. Among adopters, partial and full adopters were similar except partial adopters were less likely to discuss AS with patients (P = .03) and more likely to be anxious (P = .04), have reservations (P = .03), and have concerns about the psychological burden (P = .009) of AS. Few respondents (3.2%) believed patients were aware of AS. Conclusion: Widespread adoption of AS will require increased patient and physician awareness, interest, and evaluation of outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available