Journal
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1637, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461832
Keywords
Review; Capillary electrochromatography; Electroosmotic flow; Enantioseparations
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Capillary electrochromatography (CEC) has gone through a dramatic development from promise to growth to stagnation and decline. Various reasons such as competitive trends, inadequate development, and lack of innovative activities have led to the stagnation of CEC in the field.
Capillary electrochromatography (CEC) represents a technique with less than 30 years of intense development and in this period this technique has seen huge promise, fast development, stagnation, and significant decline of innovative activity. The major goal of the present overview is not to present an extensive review of the literature on chiral CEC but to analyze the reasons for this dramatic development and attempting to answer questions such as: 1) Was the potential of CEC reasonably evaluated in 1990s before starting the explosive development in this field? 2) Did the development of this technique take the right track? 3) What other developments and competitive trends led to stagnation in the advancement of CEC? 4) Why is the activity in this field currently decreasing? 5) What are the current challenges and promises and what is the future of chiral CEC? (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available