4.6 Review

Three-dimensional models to study breast cancer (Review)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 331-343

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5176

Keywords

breast cancer; three-dimensional model; spheroids models; mammosphere; organ-on-a-chip models; hydrogel models; bio-printing models

Categories

Funding

  1. Health Research Fund of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) [FIS/IMSS/PROT/EMER18/1848, FIS/IMSS/PROT/G15/1472]
  2. IMSS Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women globally, with research focused on in vitro and in vivo models. Three-dimensional in vitro models have been developed to better replicate interactions between tumor cells and the tumor environment observed in vivo. These models offer advantages in studying breast cancer physiology.
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly occurring cancer and primary cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. Investigations into BC have been conducted in in vitro and in vivo models. Of these models, the cultivation of tumor cell lines in two-dimensional models is the most widely employed in vitro model to study tumor physiology. However, this approach does not accurately model all aspects observed in tumors. To address these limitations, three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models have been developed. In these, it is possible to reproduce the interaction between tumor cells and the extra-cellular matrix, as well as the interrelationship between tumor cells and stromal cells, in order to replicate the interactions observed within the 3D environment of in vivo tumors. The present review summarizes the most common 3D in vitro models used to study BC, including spheroid models, organ-on-a-chip models, hydrogel models and bio-printed models, with a discussion of their particular advantages and limitations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available