4.5 Article

The predictive value of mean serum uric acid levels for developing prediabetes

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages 79-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.011

Keywords

Uric acid; Prediabetes; Cohort studies

Funding

  1. key technologies R&D program of Tianjin [11ZCGYSY05700, 12ZCZDSY20400, 13ZCZDSY20200]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Program [2012BAI02B02]
  3. Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS) Nutrition Research Foundation-DSM Research Fund [2014-071]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372118, 81372467, 81302422]
  5. Technologies development program of Beichen District of Tianjin [bcws2013-21, bc2014-05]
  6. technologies project of Tianjin Binhai New Area [2013-02-04, 2013-02-06]
  7. Science Foundation of Tianjin Medical University [2010KY28, 2013KYQ24]
  8. Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education [GW2014-5]
  9. National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates, China [201510062013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: We aimed to assess the predictive value of mean serum uric acid (SUA) levels for incident prediabetes. Methods: Normoglycemic adults (n = 39,353) were followed for a median of 3.0 years. Prediabetes is defined as impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or impaired HbA1c (IA1c), based on the American Diabetes Association criteria. Serum SUA levels were measured annually. Four diagnostic strategies were used to detect prediabetes in four separate analyses (Analysis 1: IFG. Analysis 2: IFG+IGT. Analysis 3: IFG+IA1c. Analysis 4: IFG+IGT+IA1c). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relationship between SUA quintiles and prediabetes. C-statistic was additionally used in the final analysis to assess the accuracy of predictions based upon baseline SUA and mean SUA, respectively. Results: After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of prediabetes for the highest versus lowest quintile of mean SUA were 1.22 (1.10, 1.36) in analysis 1; 1.59 (1.23, 2.05) in analysis 2; 1.62 (1.34, 1.95) in analysis 3 and 1.67 (1.31, 2.13) in analysis 4. In contrast, for baseline SUA, significance was only reached in analyses 3 and 4. Moreover, compared with baseline SUA, mean SUA value was associated with a significant increase in the C-statistic (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Mean SUA value was strongly and positively related to prediabetes risk, and showed better predictive ability for prediabetes than baseline SUA. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available