4.5 Review

Advances in green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles and their application in food packaging

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 2640-2650

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14916

Keywords

Active packaging; antimicrobial activity; antioxidant activity; selenium nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Thuthuka National Research Foundation [TTK 180427324698]
  2. Water Research Commission [K52488//3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The past decade has witnessed a growing adoption of nanotechnology in the food industry, particularly in food packaging. Selenium nanoparticles have gained popularity due to their high biological activity, but their conventional synthesis methods are associated with toxicity. Recent research has focused on environmentally friendly synthesis of selenium nanoparticles to reduce hazardous by-products.
The past decade has seen nanotechnology progressively being adopted by the food industry. Its wide application in food packaging has redefined conservative food packaging with active and intelligent packaging. Nanomaterials do not only influence food quality and safety but also offer health-related benefits. Selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) have been preferred in recent years because of their high biological activity. However, they are generally synthesised using physicochemical methods which are associated with toxicity. In the past decade, efforts have been directed towards advancement of green synthesis of SeNPs to minimise hazardous by-products. The antioxidant and biocidal effects of SeNPs are generally investigated by direct contact between the oxidisable matter and/or test organisms. Lately, there is focus on the effect SeNPs incorporated into packaging films. This paper will review developments on SeNPs synthesised via plant extracts from the year 2010 to present and their potential application in active food packaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available