4.7 Article

Sizing of a Battery Pack Based on Series/Parallel Configurations for a High-Power Electric Vehicle as a Constrained Optimization Problem

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 14150-14159

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3004010

Keywords

Battery design; constrained optimization problem; constraint satisfaction problem; electric vehicles; multi-objective optimization

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program [950-230672]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RDCJP 490763]
  3. European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization - COMPETE 2020 Program
  4. Portuguese funding agency (FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016434, UIBD/00308/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The design of electric vehicle batteries is a challenge requiring significant computational, human and material resources. This paper proposes a new framework to design a battery pack that allows quick iterations between designs and computes optimized configurations to give more information about the best available solutions. The battery pack is represented as a series/parallel configuration in a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) that is solved to exploit every possible configuration for specific vehicle requirements. The result is then used in a multi-objective Constrained Optimization Problem (COP) to determine the non-dominated (Pareto optimal) solutions according to selected objectives functions. Non-dominated solutions are computed by optimizing weighted-sum scalar functions as well as minimizing different types of distances to a design reference. A case study is explored to design a battery pack for an electric motorcycle. A 24s/6p battery module designed with this methodology has been validated by experiments and the battery pack has successfully been used at MotoStudent in 2018.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available