4.7 Article

Destination-Aware Task Assignment in Spatial Crowdsourcing: A Worker Decomposition Approach

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING
Volume 32, Issue 12, Pages 2336-2350

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2019.2922604

Keywords

Spatial crowdsourcing; spatial task assignment; algorithm

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61532018, 61836007, 61832017]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP170101172]
  3. Major Project of Zhejiang Lab [2019DH0ZX01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the proliferation of GPS-enabled smart devices and increased availability of wireless network, spatial crowdsourcing (SC) has been recently proposed as a framework to automatically request workers (i.e., smart device carriers) to perform location-sensitive tasks (e.g., taking scenic photos, reporting events). In this paper, we study a destination-aware task assignment problem that concerns the optimal strategy of assigning each task to proper worker such that the total number of completed tasks can be maximized whilst all workers can reach their destinations before deadlines after performing assigned tasks. Finding the global optimal assignment turns out to be an intractable problem since it does not imply optimal assignment for individual worker. Observing that the task assignment dependency only exists amongst subsets of workers, we utilize tree-decomposition technique to separate workers into independent clusters and develop an efficient depth-first search algorithm with progressive bounds to prune non-promising assignments. In order to make our proposed framework applicable to more scenarios, we further optimize the original framework by proposing strategies to reduce the overall travel cost and allow each task to be assigned to multiple workers. Extensive empirical studies verify that the proposed technique and optimization strategies perform effectively and settle the problem nicely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available