4.7 Article

An assessment of the performance of scenarios against historical global emissions for IPCC reports

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102199

Keywords

Emissions scenarios; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Emission scenarios against historical trends; Socioeconomic trends; Global; Non-OECD/OECD

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [W07.303.104]
  2. Governance and Inclusive Development Group of the University of Amsterdam
  3. ANTHS - Innovation Anthropology (Denmark)
  4. research unit CCIAM-cE3c, University of Lisbon (Portugal)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emissions scenarios are crucial for assessing future climate change and response strategies, and their relevance needs regular reassessment. Historical trends in CO2 emissions are consistent with medium scenarios and serve as valid inputs for climate change analyses. Global CO2 emissions are closely linked to primary energy and GDP, generally following a medium-high pathway.
Long-term emissions scenarios have served as the primary basis for assessing future climate change and response strategies. Therefore, it is important to regularly reassess the relevance of emissions scenarios in light of changing global circumstances and compare them with long-term developments to determine if they are still plausible, considering the newest insights. Four scenario series, SA90,1592, SRES, and RCP/SSP, were central in the scenario-based literature informing the five Assessment Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the sixth assessment cycle. Here we analyze the historical trends of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industry and emissions drivers between 1960 and 2017. We then compare the emission scenario series with historical trends for the period 1990-2017/2018. The results show that historical trends are quite consistent with medium scenarios in each series. As a result, they can be regarded as valid inputs for past and future analyses of climate change and impacts. Global CO2 emissions 1960-2018 (and 1990-2018) comprised six (and three) overall subperiods of emissions growth significantly higher and lower than average. Historically, CO2 emissions (in absolute numbers and growth rate) are tightly coupled with primary energy and indirectly with GDP. Global emissions generally followed a medium-high pathway, captured by middle-of-the-road scenario narratives in the earlier series, and by combinations of global-sustainability and middle-of-the-road narratives in the most recent series (SRES and SSP-baselines). Historical non-OECD trends were best captured by rapid-growth and regional-competition scenarios, while OECD trends were close to regional-sustainability and global-sustainability scenarios. Areas where the emissions scenarios captured the historical trends less well, are renewable and nuclear primary energy supply. The fact that the actual historical development is consistent with rapid-growth narratives in the non-OECD regions might have important implications for future greenhouse gas emissions and associated climatic change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available