Quantifying Structural Uncertainty in Paleoclimate Data Assimilation With an Application to the Last Millennium
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Quantifying Structural Uncertainty in Paleoclimate Data Assimilation With an Application to the Last Millennium
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 47, Issue 22, Pages -
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Online
2020-11-05
DOI
10.1029/2020gl090485
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Variability in the northern North Atlantic and Arctic oceans across the last two millennia: A review
- (2019) P. Moffa‐Sánchez et al. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
- Local Regions Associated With Interdecadal Global Temperature Variability in the Last Millennium Reanalysis and CMIP5 Models
- (2019) L.A. Parsons et al. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
- Linear Inverse Modeling for Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean Ensemble Climate Prediction
- (2019) W. Andre Perkins et al. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
- A global glacial ocean state estimate constrained by upper-ocean temperature proxies
- (2018) Daniel E. Amrhein et al. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
- Change in the magnitude and mechanisms of global temperature variability with warming
- (2017) Patrick T. Brown et al. Nature Climate Change
- A global multiproxy database for temperature reconstructions of the Common Era
- (2017) Julien Emile-Geay et al. Scientific Data
- A Systematic Comparison of Particle Filter and EnKF in Assimilating Time-Averaged Observations
- (2017) Huaran Liu et al. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
- The last millennium climate reanalysis project: Framework and first results
- (2016) Gregory J. Hakim et al. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
- Inferring surface water equilibrium calciteδ18O during the last deglacial period from benthic foraminiferal records: Implications for ocean circulation
- (2015) Daniel E. Amrhein et al. PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
- A global perspective on CMIP5 climate model biases
- (2014) Chunzai Wang et al. Nature Climate Change
- Assimilation of Time-Averaged Pseudoproxies for Climate Reconstruction
- (2013) Nathan J. Steiger et al. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
- Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia
- (2013) Nature Geoscience
- Applications of proxy system modeling in high resolution paleoclimatology
- (2013) M.N. Evans et al. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
- El Niño teleconnections in CMIP5 models
- (2012) Bryan C. Weare CLIMATE DYNAMICS
- Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 data set
- (2012) Colin P. Morice et al. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH
- An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
- (2011) Karl E. Taylor et al. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
- Spatial performance of four climate field reconstruction methods targeting the Common Era
- (2011) J. E. Smerdon et al. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
- Climate models as a test bed for climate reconstruction methods: pseudoproxy experiments
- (2011) Jason E. Smerdon Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change
- Sea Surface Temperature Variability: Patterns and Mechanisms
- (2009) Clara Deser et al. Annual Review of Marine Science
- A Bayesian Algorithm for Reconstructing Climate Anomalies in Space and Time. Part I: Development and Applications to Paleoclimate Reconstruction Problems
- (2009) Martin P. Tingley et al. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
- Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia
- (2008) M. E. Mann et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started