Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages 1151-1157
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2020-12-03
DOI
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.134
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012–2013
- (2018) Reshef Tal et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response—a randomized, controlled trial
- (2017) Å. Magnusson et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Association Between Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve and Infertility Among Older Women of Reproductive Age
- (2017) Anne Z. Steiner et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Antimüllerian hormone and pregnancy loss from the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial
- (2016) Shvetha M. Zarek et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012–2013
- (2016) David B. Seifer et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation–intrauterine insemination
- (2016) Karl R. Hansen et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Does ovarian reserve predict egg quality in unstimulated therapeutic donor insemination cycles?
- (2015) Mike Ripley et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Antimüllerian hormone as predictor of implantation and clinical pregnancy after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) Reshef Tal et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Müllerian hormone
- (2015) Richard Fleming et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- Prognosis factors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination with the husband's sperm: conclusions of an analysis of 2,019 cycles
- (2014) Laka Dinelli et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- The predictive accuracy of anti-Müllerian hormone for live birth after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
- (2014) Stamatina Iliodromiti et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Prediction of an excessive response in in vitro fertilization from patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests and comparison in subgroups: an individual patient data meta-analysis
- (2013) Simone L. Broer et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice
- (2013) A. La Marca et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach
- (2012) Simone L. Broer et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria
- (2011) A. P. Ferraretti et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- Ovarian primordial and nongrowing follicle counts according to the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) staging system
- (2011) Karl R. Hansen et al. MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY
- The journey from the old to the new AMH assay: how to avoid getting lost in the values
- (2011) S.M. Nelson et al. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
- Serum anti-Mullerian hormone is a useful measure of quantitative ovarian reserve but does not predict the chances of live-birth pregnancy
- (2010) Kelton TREMELLEN et al. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
- Comparison of ovarian function markers in users of hormonal contraceptives during the hormone-free interval and subsequent natural early follicular phases
- (2010) M. H. van den Berg et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis
- (2010) S. L. Broer et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART)
- (2009) A. La Marca et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Establishing the intercycle variability of three-dimensional ultrasonographic predictors of ovarian reserve
- (2008) Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation
- (2008) Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- The predictive value of ovarian reserve tests for spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile ovulatory women
- (2008) M.L. Haadsma et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- A new model of reproductive aging: the decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause
- (2008) K. R. Hansen et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION
- The predictive value for in vitro fertility delivery rates is greatly impacted by the method used to select the threshold between normal and elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone
- (2007) Richard T. Scott et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
- Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve
- (2007) J KWEE et al. FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started