4.5 Review

Molecular imaging in immuno-oncology: current status and translational perspectives

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 1199-1211

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1854090

Keywords

Immunotherapy; immune checkpoint inhibitors; PET/CT; F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose; metabolic parameters; Zr-89-monoclonal antibodies; immunoPET; theranostics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Only 20-40% of patients respond to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, the early identification of subjects that can benefit from such therapeutic regimen is mandatory. Areas covered: The immunobiological mechanisms of ICIs are briefly illustrated. Furthermore, the limitations of traditional radiological approaches are covered. Then, the pros and cons of molecular imaging through positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) are reviewed, with a particular focus on (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) and PET-derived metabolic parameters. Lastly, translational perspective of radiopharmaceuticals others than F-18-FDG such as (89)zirconium (Zr-89) or fluorine-18 (F-18) labeled monoclonal antibodies (e.g.Zr-89-atezolizumab, Zr-89-nivolumab) binding to specific biomarkers are discussed. Expert opinion: Molecular imaging presents a prominent role for the management of oncological patients treated with ICIs. Preliminary clinical data indicate that PET/CT with F-18-FDG is useful for assessing the response to treatment and for the imaging of immune-related adverse effects. Nevertheless, the methodological approach (iPERCIST, PERCIMT, or others) to be used for an optimal diagnostic accuracy and patients' evaluation is still a debated issue. PET/CT with radioligands directed toward ICIs biomarkers, although is still in a translational phase, holds the promise of accurately predicting the response to treatment and revealing the acquired resistance to immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available