4.7 Article

Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of a CI engine fueled with diesel-biodiesel blends containing various metal-oxide nanoparticles

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118830

Keywords

Exergy; Exergoeconomics; Sustainability; Nanofuel; Nanoparticle

Funding

  1. Duzce University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [2020.07.04.1097]
  2. Duzce University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, comprehensive exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses were conducted on a single-cylinder, four-stroke diesel engine. Different nanofuels were tested at varying engine loads, with D90B10Al(2)O(3) showing the highest exergy efficiency and sustainability index values. Al2O3-doped nanofuel emerged as the best test fuel in terms of exergy, exergoeconomics, and sustainability analyzes.
Comprehensive exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of a single-cylinder, four-stroke, naturally aspirated compression ignition (CI) diesel engine were conducted in the present paper. Exergy-based sustainability indicators were also determined in the study. The test engine was fueled with diesel fuel (D100), %90 diesel+10% waste cooking oil methyl ester blend (D90B10), D90B10 with Al2O3 nanoparticle of 100 ppm (D90B10Al(2)O(3)), D90B10 with TiO2 nanoparticle of 100 ppm (D90B10TiO(2)), and D90B10 with SiO2 nanoparticle of 100 ppm (D90B10SiO(2)) nanofuels, separately. The tests were performed at a constant engine speed of 2000 rpm and at varying engine loads from 2.5 to 10 Nm with an increment of 2.5 Nm. As a result, the exergy efficiencies of the test engine for D90B10 and D90B10Al(2)O(3) were determined to be 25.57% and 28.12%, respectively. The lowest cost flow rate of crankshaft work was found to be 0.4247 US$/h at 2.5 Nm, 0.5154 US$/h at 5 Nm for D90B10Al(2)O(3), and 0.6029 US$/h at 7.5 Nm, 0.7253 US$/h at 10 Nm for D90B10SiO(2). At 10 Nm, the highest and lowest sustainability index values were determined to be 1.391 for D90B10Al(2)O(3) and 1.344 for D90B10, respectively. From the perspective of exergy and sustainability, D90B10Al(2)O(3) had the best results. Besides, from the perspective of exergoeconomics, D90B10Al(2)O(3) had the best results at lower engine loads. As a conclusion, it can be said that nanofuels showed better performances compared to neat diesel fuel and diesel-biodiesel blend in the terms of in terms of exergy, exergoeconomics, and sustainability analyzes. Considering all analyses together, it is noticed that Al2O3-doped nanofuel is the best test fuel for this study, and then it is followed by SiO2 and TiO2-doped nanofuels, respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available