4.5 Article

Numerical Modeling and Safety Design for Lithium-Ion Vehicle Battery Modules Subject to Crush Loading

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14010118

Keywords

Li-ion battery module; crush loading; failure models; structural response; energy absorption; finite element analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. MIT Battery Consortium
  2. Ford Motor Company
  3. NSF Major Research Instrumentation Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A computational study was conducted on crushing tests of lithium-ion vehicle battery modules, developing detailed FE and simplified models to predict short circuit initiation reasonably. The results demonstrated good agreement in structural failure modes and force-displacement responses, showing potential for improving battery module safety design.
In this work, a computational study was carried out to simulate crushing tests on lithium-ion vehicle battery modules. The tests were performed on commercial battery modules subject to wedge cutting at low speeds. Based on loading and boundary conditions in the tests, finite element (FE) models were developed using explicit FEA code LS-DYNA. The model predictions demonstrated a good agreement in terms of structural failure modes and force-displacement responses at both cell and module levels. The model was extended to study additional loading conditions such as indentation by a cylinder and a rectangular block. The effect of other module components such as the cover and cooling plates was analyzed, and the results have the potential for improving battery module safety design. Based on the detailed FE model, to reduce its computational cost, a simplified model was developed by representing the battery module with a homogeneous material law. Then, all three scenarios were simulated, and the results show that this simplified model can reasonably predict the short circuit initiation of the battery module.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available