4.6 Article

Cobalt-nickel sulfide nanosheets modified by nitrogen-doped porous reduced graphene oxide as high-conductivity cathode materials for supercapacitor

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 362, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137156

Keywords

NiCo2S4; Porous nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide; Hybrid supercapacitor

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi [AA18118001]
  2. Guangxi Innovation Team Project [2019GXNSFGA245005]
  3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Materials Foundation [1910J27-Z]
  4. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2017GXNSFBA19/3075]
  5. Directors' Fund of Guangxi Manufacturing Systems and Advanced Manufacturing Technology Laboratory [16-380-12-008Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High conductivity NiCo2S4 (NCS) nanosheets in situ grown in porous nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (PN-rGO) materials were successfully prepared via a simple hydrothermal method. A synergistic effect between the NCS and PN-rGO matrix is observed on the electrochemical performance of the composites. PN-rGO/NCS exhibits an equivalent ultralow diffusion resistance and charge transfer resistance (0.16 Omega), ultrahigh specific capacitance (1,687 F g(-1) at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1)), and an excellent rate capability (1,478 F g(-1) at a current density of 10 A g(-1)). The asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) is designed with PN-rGO/NCS as the positive electrode and active carbon as the negative electrode. The ASC device exhibits a high capacitance (355.5 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1)). Density functional theory calculations show PN-rGO/NCS to increase the electrical conductivity of the material, and concomitantly the electrochemical performance. The data suggest that the PN-rGO/NCS hybrid structure can be considered as a future supercapacitor electrode material. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available