Prediction of mortality and major cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: External validation of UK Prospective Diabetes Study outcomes model version 2 in two European observational cohorts
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Prediction of mortality and major cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: External validation of UK Prospective Diabetes Study outcomes model version 2 in two European observational cohorts
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-12-30
DOI
10.1111/dom.14311
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Evaluating the Ability of Economic Models of Diabetes to Simulate New Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials: A Report on the Ninth Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge
- (2020) Lei Si et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Performance of the UKPDS Outcomes Model 2 for Predicting Death and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from a German Population-Based Cohort
- (2019) Michael Laxy et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- The Challenge of Transparency and Validation in Health Economic Decision Modelling: A View from Mount Hood
- (2019) Seamus Kent et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Transparency: A Report on the Eighth Mount Hood Challenge
- (2018) Andrew J. Palmer et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- The Hoorn Diabetes Care System (DCS) cohort. A prospective cohort of persons with type 2 diabetes treated in primary care in the Netherlands
- (2017) Amber AWA van der Heijden et al. BMJ Open
- Development and validation of Risk Equations for Complications Of type 2 Diabetes (RECODe) using individual participant data from randomised trials
- (2017) Sanjay Basu et al. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Validation of the Economic and Health Outcomes Model of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (ECHO-T2DM)
- (2016) Michael Willis et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Excess Mortality among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes
- (2015) Mauro Tancredi et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Validation of the IHE Cohort Model of Type 2 Diabetes and the Impact of Choice of Macrovascular Risk Equations
- (2014) Adam Lundqvist et al. PLoS One
- Prediction of mortality and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model in the Casale Monferrato Survey, Italy
- (2013) E. Pagano et al. DIABETOLOGIA
- UKPDS Outcomes Model 2: a new version of a model to simulate lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the 30 year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS 82
- (2013) A. J. Hayes et al. DIABETOLOGIA
- Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Complications: A Report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting
- (2013) Andrew J. Palmer VALUE IN HEALTH
- The Diabetes Pearl: Diabetes biobanking in The Netherlands
- (2012) Esther van’t Riet et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Temporal Validation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model Using 10-Year Posttrial Monitoring Data
- (2012) J. Leal et al. DIABETES CARE
- Estimated incidence of cardiovascular complications related to type 2 diabetes in Mexico using the UKPDS outcome model and a population-based survey
- (2011) Nancy Reynoso-Noverón et al. Cardiovascular Diabetology
- Use of the UKPDS Outcomes Model to predict all-cause mortality in U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Comparison of predicted versus observed mortality
- (2010) May Song et al. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models
- (2009) Ewout W. Steyerberg et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Is Relative Mortality of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Decreasing?
- (2008) M. C. Gulliford et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Changes over time in the prevalence and quality of care of type 2 diabetes in Italy: The Casale Monferrato Surveys, 1988 and 2000
- (2007) Graziella Bruno et al. NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started