4.7 Review

Interventional Radiology for Local Immunotherapy in Oncology

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 2698-2705

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-4073

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technical considerations play a crucial role in the success and development of HIT-IT, impacting safety, efficacy, and patient outcomes. Image-guided tumor access can enhance treatment efficacy by increasing intratumoral drug concentration while minimizing systemic exposure. Direct access to the tumor allows for sequential sampling to better understand drug dynamics and efficacy.
Human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT) is under rapid development, with promising preliminary results and high expectations for current phase III trials. While outcomes remain paramount for patients and the referring oncologists, the technical aspects of drug injection are critical to the interventional radiologist to ensure optimal and reproducible outcomes. The technical considerations for HIT-IT affect the safety, efficacy, and further development of this treatment option. Image-guided access to the tumor allows the therapeutic index of a treatment to be enhanced by increasing the intratumoral drug concentration while minimizing its systemic exposure and associated on-target off-tumor adverse events. Direct access to the tumor also enables the acquisition of cancer tissue for sequential sampling to better understand the pharmacodynamics of the injected immunotherapy and its efficacy through correlation of immune responses, pathologic responses, and imaging tumor response. The aim of this article is to share the technical insights of HIT-IT, with particular consideration for patient selection, lesion assessment, image guidance, and technical injection options. In addition, the organization of a standard patient workflow is discussed, so as to optimize HIT-IToutcomeand the patient experience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available