4.6 Article

An inter-comparison performance assessment of a Brazilian global sub-seasonal prediction model against four sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction project models

Journal

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
Volume 56, Issue 7-8, Pages 2359-2375

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-020-05589-5

Keywords

Sub-seasonal prediction; Forecast verification; Intraseasonal variability; Madden-Julian oscillation

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [88881.189179/2018-01]
  3. University of Reading [GS18-179]
  4. CNPq [167804/2018-9, 305206/2019-2]
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2015/50687-8]
  6. National Centre for Atmospheric Science ODA national capability programme ACREW - NERC [NE/R000034/1]
  7. GCRF
  8. Climate Science for Services Partnership Brazil project (CSSP-Brazil) - Newton Fund
  9. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted an inter-comparison performance evaluation of the newly developed Brazilian Atmospheric Model against four S2S prediction project models, with ECMWF performing the best in precipitation anomaly prediction. CPTEC showed competitive performance in MJO predictions compared to the other models.
This paper presents an inter-comparison performance assessment of the newly developed Centre for Weather Forecast and Climate Studies (CPTEC) model (the Brazilian Atmospheric Model version 1.2, BAM-1.2) against four sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction project models from: Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), Environmental and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM). The inter-comparison was performed using hindcasts of weekly precipitation anomalies and the daily evolution of Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) for 12 extended austral summers (November-March, 1999/2000-2010/2011), leading to a verification sample of 120 hindcasts. The deterministic assessment of the prediction of precipitation anomalies revealed ECMWF as the model presenting the highest (smallest) correlation (root mean squared error, RMSE) values among all examined models. JMA ranked as the second best performing model, followed by ECCC, CPTEC and BoM. The probabilistic assessment for the event positive precipitation anomaly revealed that ECMWF presented better discrimination, reliability and resolution when compared to CPTEC and BoM. However, these three models produced overconfident probabilistic predictions. For MJO predictions, CPTEC crosses the 0.5 bivariate correlation threshold at around 19 days when using the mean of 4 ensemble members, presenting similar performance to BoM, JMA and ECCC. Overall, CPTEC proved to be competitive compared to the S2S models investigated, but with respect to ECMWF there is scope to improve the prediction system, likely by a combination of including coupling to an interactive ocean, improving resolution and model parameterization schemes, and better methods for ensemble generation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available