4.7 Article

Copper release from waste rocks in an abandoned mine (NE, Brazil) and its impacts on ecosystem environmental quality

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127843

Keywords

Mining waste; Copper emission; Environment contamination; Benthic organism; Biodiversity

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development from Brazil (CNPq) [168847/2017-5, 308288/2014-9]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  3. Cross-Research in Environmental Technologies [AGRUP 2015/02, 2018-PG100]
  4. Conselleria de Educacion, Universidade e Formacion ProfesionalXunta de Galicia [2018-PG036]
  5. [ED31C2018/12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used controlled experiments and sample analysis to find that abandoned copper mine rocks still contain high levels of copper after weathering, with a significant amount of copper being released into the environment over the past 30 years.
This study aimed to estimate the impact of an abandoned copper (Cu) mine on ecosystem environmental quality, using integrated ecological and biogeochemical analyses. Through a controlled experiment, the amount of Cu released by waste rocks, Cu adsorbed in soils, Cu geochemical behaviour and its leached amount were measured. Furthermore, to investigate the impacts of mine drainage on the adjacent ecosystem, samples of sediments, water and aquatic macroinvertebrates were analysed. We found that waste rocks still have high Cu concentration even after 30 years under weathering, ranging from 7782 to 8717 mg kg(-1), associated mainly with carbonates, amorphous oxides and sulphides. It was estimated that 7.2 tonnes of Cu were released by waste rocks into the environment over last 30 years. The concentration of Cu observed in Ubari stream water was (

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available