4.7 Article

Diffusion and fluid interaction in Itrongay pegmatite (Madagascar): Evidence from in situ 40Ar/39Ar dating of gem-quality alkali feldspar and U-Pb dating of protogenetic apatite inclusions

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 556, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119841

Keywords

Itrongay; Madagascar; In situ; Alkali feldspar; 40Ar/39Ar; Apatite; U-Pb; Dating; Thermochronology; Geochronology; Diffusion; Fluid; interaction

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [04/BR/ES0007/EC07, 13/RC/2092]
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. European Research Council advanced grant RHEOLITH [290864]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche project LABEX VOLTAIRE [ANR-10-LABX-10001]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche project EQUIPEX PLANEX [ANR-11-EQPX-0036]
  6. Region Centre Val de Loire project ARGON
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_160052]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-EQPX-0036] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_160052] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alkali feldspar 40Ar/39Ar and apatite U-Pb geochronological studies have typically invoked two mechanisms to account for apparent loss of radiogenic 40Ar and Pb206-208. Some studies have suggested that the radiogenic isotopes were lost by volume diffusion and used these dates to constrain temporal variations of rock temperatures; others have argued that the radiogenic isotopes were lost due to interaction with fluids and related these dates to chemical alteration. These two end-member interpretations have fundamentally different implications for tectonic models derived from geochronological data, and therefore it is important to reliably identify the principal mechanism for loss of radiogenic isotopes. Here, we revisit the mechanisms of 40Ar loss in the famous gem-quality alkali feldspar from the Itrongay pegmatite in Madagascar. Previous studies have suggested that volume diffusion is the dominant mechanism of 40Ar loss, providing key evidence to support the use of 40Ar/39Ar dating of alkali feldspar for thermochronology. We attempted to verify these results by obtaining time-temperature paths from petrologically characterised cogenetic feldspar and apatite from the Itrongay pegmatite and comparing them with each other. However, our results suggest that only a minor component in the variability of 40Ar/39Ar dates of Itrongay feldspar is related to the diffusive loss of 40Ar, and that this loss was not compatible with the majority of previously proposed models, which hinders quantitative interpretations. The crystal studied here grew in five episodes related to the influx initially of co-existing dense SiO2-rich solution and CO2-dominated fluid (the first and supposedly the following two episodes) and subsequently of H2O-rich fluid (supposedly the final two episodes). Much greater component in the variability of the acquired 40Ar/39Ar dates is interpreted to reflect the differences in the ages of these growth episodes, which we estimate to span from 477 Ma to 176 Ma (the first four episodes). Apatite inclusions in this crystal are interpreted to be xenocrysts derived from the country rocks of the Itrongay pegmatite. These yield older U-Pb dates than the estimated age of their host feldspar and have apparently experienced diffusive loss of Pb-206,Pb-207 prior to entrapment. Our 40Ar/39Ar results indicate that there is a lack of unambiguous evidence for diffusive loss of 40Ar from alkali feldspar that can be readily interpreted for thermochronological purposes. However, in situ 40Ar/39Ar dating of alkali feldspar appears to be a promising tool for tracking fluid-flow events in the Earth's crust whose applicability is not restricted to sedimentary rocks. Our U-Pb results corroborate previous suggestions that U-Pb dating of apatite can be used for thermochronology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available