4.6 Review

A basic review on systemic treatment options in WHO grade II-III gliomas

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102124

Keywords

Glioma; Astrocytoma; Oligodendroglioma; Temozolomide; Chemotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical University of Vienna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

WHO grade II-III gliomas are rare primary brain tumors with longer median survival compared to grade IV glioblastoma. Treatment involves maximal safe resection and adjuvant therapies, with challenges in conducting clinical trials due to rarity and long follow-up times. The 2016 WHO Classification introduced a molecular diagnostic framework for more homogenous subgroups. Available evidence for adjuvant treatment was generated pre-molecular era, emphasizing the need for further research in this field.
WHO grade II-III gliomas are rare primary brain tumors occurring at a median age of about 35-55 years. Median survival is longer in WHO grade II-III glioma compared with WHO grade IV glioblastoma as survival times of up to 10 years and longer can be observed. Maximal safe resection and adjuvant therapies including chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the mainstay of treatment. Clinical trials in WHO grade II-III tumors are challenging due to the rarity and the long follow up times. The 2016 WHO Classification of Central Nervous Tumours introduced a new diagnostic framework relying on molecular characteristics, providing the definition of prognostically more homogenous subgroups compared to the histopathological analysis. Most available evidence on the adjuvant treatment of WHO II-III gliomas was generated in the pre-molecular era, challenging the interpretation of study results. The present review therefore summarizes the available data from prospective trials on systemic treatment options in WHO grade II-III glioma, considering molecular markers, recently published results and future outlooks in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available