COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-01-04
DOI
10.1186/s12874-020-01190-w
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China
- (2020) Dawei Wang et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Cross‐species transmission of the newly identified coronavirus 2019‐nCoV
- (2020) Wei Ji et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
- Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study
- (2020) Heshui Shi et al. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- Open peer-review platform for COVID-19 preprints
- (2020) Michael A. Johansson et al. NATURE
- Medical Journals and the 2019-nCoV Outbreak
- (2020) Eric J. Rubin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- COVID-19
- (2020) Valentin Fuster et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Artificial intelligence–enabled rapid diagnosis of patients with COVID-19
- (2020) Xueyan Mei et al. NATURE MEDICINE
- Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients with Severe Covid-19
- (2020) Jonathan Grein et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Against pandemic research exceptionalism
- (2020) Alex John London et al. SCIENCE
- Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility
- (2020) Maimuna S Majumder et al. Lancet Global Health
- Research methodology and characteristics of journal articles with original data, preprint articles and registered clinical trial protocols about COVID-19
- (2020) Mahir Fidahic et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Rapid publications risk the integrity of science in the era of COVID-19
- (2020) N. Bagdasarian et al. BMC Medicine
- An evidence mapping and analysis of registered COVID-19 clinical trials in China
- (2020) Liming Lu et al. BMC Medicine
- The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study
- (2020) Qian Liu et al. Lancet Global Health
- Publishing in the time of COVID-19
- (2020) The Lancet Global Health Lancet Global Health
- Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study
- (2020) Long H Nguyen et al. Lancet Public Health
- When science goes viral: The research response during three months of the COVID-19 outbreak
- (2020) Joanna Nowakowska et al. BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
- Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic
- (2020) Silvia Gianola et al. PLoS One
- The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT)
- (2016) L. Rosella et al. PUBLIC HEALTH
- Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)
- (2016) Martin J Downes et al. BMJ Open
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors
- (2013) Jill A. Hayden et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
- (2010) Andreas Stang EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started