4.6 Article

Phase II randomized trial of capecitabine with bevacizumab and external beam radiation therapy as preoperative treatment for patients with resectable locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: long term results

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07661-z

Keywords

Locally-advanced rectal cancer; Bevacizumab; Neoadjuvant; Chemoradiotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Roche Farma, S.A.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundPreoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine is considered as a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The Tratamiento de Tumores Digestivos group (TTD) previously reported in a randomized Ph II study that the addition of Bevacizumab to capecitabine-RT conferred no differences in the pre-defined efficacy endpoint (pathological complete response).We present the follow-up results of progression-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival data at 3 and 5years.MethodsPatients (pts) were randomized to receive 5weeks of radiotherapy (45Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent Capecitabine 825mg/m2 twice daily, 5days per week with (arm A) or without (arm b) bevacizumab (5mg/kg once every 2weeks).ResultsIn our study, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting shows no differences in pathological complete response (15.9% vs 10.9%), distant relapse-free survival (81.0 vs 80.4 and 76.2% vs 78.2% at 3 and 5years respectively), disease-free survival (75% vs 71.7 and 68.1% vs 69.57% at 3 and 5years respectively) nor overall survival at 5-years of follow-up (81.8% vs 86.9%).Conclusionsthe addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine plus radiotherapy does not confer statistically significant advantages neither in distant relapse-free survival nor in disease-free survival nor in Overall Survival in the short or long term.Trial registrationEudraCT number: 2009-010192-24.Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01043484.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available