4.8 Article

Techno-economic analysis of biomass processing with dual outputs of energy and activated carbon

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 319, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124108

Keywords

Biomass processing; Chemical reaction; Process simulation; Activated carbon; Techno-economy; Aspen Plus

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21978128, 91934302]
  2. Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (JASTIF) [CX(18)3039]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering [KL18-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the production of activated carbon (AC) and fuel gas using spent mushroom substrate with two different processes, showing that air activation offers economic advantages but requires careful assessment of temperature control and operational stability risks. Flue gas activation is more reliable and beneficial for long-term operation, generating less CO2.
Biomass utilization is facing great challenge mainly due to the low profit margin of biomass products. Bio-energy plants using gasification and liquefaction technologies are barely surviving, while biomass to activated carbon (AC) route has been demonstrated economically successful. In this work, spent mushroom substrate was used to produce AC and fuel gas with two different processes using internal flue gas and external air as activation agents, respectively. Experimental work was conducted to produce input data for Aspen Plus simulation including processing temperature, flue gas composition, AC yield, etc. Techno-economic analysis was performed, which reveals a great economic potential of integrating AC production in biomass processing. Air activation has obvious advantage in economic benefits, while the risk of precise temperature control and operation stability needs to be carefully evaluated in large-scale production. Flue gas activation is more reliable and it also generates less CO2 that is beneficial for the long-term operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available