4.2 Article

Saving the most lives-A comparison of European triage guidelines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

BIOETHICS
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 125-134

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12836

Keywords

COVID-19; European regulation; intensive care; resource allocation; triage

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article compares recommendations from five European countries on COVID-19 triage, aiming to explore the medical and ethical aspects in detail. The study seeks to identify ethical issues and coherence problems in these recommendations. Additionally, the authors hope to uncover shortcomings in a common European response to the current situation.
In March 2020, the rapid increase in severe COVID-19 cases overwhelmed the healthcare systems in several European countries. The capacities for artificial ventilation in intensive care units were too scarce to care for patients with acute respiratory disorder connected to the disease. Several professional associations published COVID-19 triage recommendations in an extremely short time: in 21 days between March 6 and March 27. In this article, we compare recommendations from five European countries, which combine medical and ethical reflections on this situation in some detail. Our aim is to provide a detailed overview on the ethical elements of the recommendations, the differences between them and their coherence. In more general terms we want to identify shortcomings in regard to a common European response to the current situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available