4.0 Review

Randomized trials with checkpoint inhibitors in acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: What have we learned so far and where are we heading?

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2020.101222

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukaemia; Myelodysplastic syndrome; Checkpoint inhibitor; Clinical trial; Biomarkers

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI's Cancer Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award (CCITLA)
  2. Dennis Cooper Hematology Young Investigator Award
  3. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P30 CA016359]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has seen dramatic advances with the approval of multiple novel agents in recent years. However, unlike solid malignancies, immune checkpoint inhibitors have yet to garner regulatory approval in AML and MDS with recent randomized clinical trials yielding only underwhelming results. Novel targets have been explored in early phase clinical trials with impressive results leading to ongoing subsequent controlled trials. However, major challenges in the field remain such as the validation of predictive genetic, molecular, and immunophenotypic biomarkers, optimization of clinical trial design, and the identification of novel synergistic combination therapies. Herein, we review recent clinical trial data focusing on randomized clinical trials and highlight limitations of the currently available evidence in an effort to suggest options for advancing the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available