4.8 Article

Rushing for subsidies: The impact of feed-in tariffs on solar photovoltaic capacity development in China

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 281, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116007

Keywords

Solar photovoltaic; Feed-in tariff; Rushing for subsidy; Difference-in-difference; China

Funding

  1. Humanities and Social Science Planning Fund Project of Ministry of Education of China [19YJC630028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Governments offer subsidies to clean technologies, with the impact on technology deployment being difficult to gauge. The case study of China's solar photovoltaic market shows that increasing PV subsidies significantly boosts the development of the national PV market.
Governments across countries often offer dynamic subsidies to clean technologies that decrease over time. However, the impact of government subsidies on technology deployment is difficult to gauge due to many confounding factors and the selection bias problem caused by the phenomenon of rushing for subsidies. This study takes China's solar photovoltaic (PV) as an example, and uses a difference-in-difference framework that leverages China's zonal feed-in tariff (FIT) policy design and its multiple changes over time. The parallel rushing for subsidies by two neighboring FIT zones provides a unique opportunity to identify the causal effect of FIT policy on newly installed PV capacity. Results show that an increase of 0.1 yuan/kWh (similar to$0.014/kWh) in PV subsidies adds about 18 GW/year of installed capacity to the national PV market, right in the middle of previous estimates in the literature. From a different perspective, if China did not have any PV subsidies, the PV deployment market would virtually disappear. The cost of carbon mitigation through PV feed-in tariffs is esti-mated at around 120 yuan (similar to$17) per ton of CO2. Our estimate of the impact of FIT on PV capacity is useful for the government to design policies that help the PV industry transit to a subsidy-free era.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available