4.8 Article

Robust High-Temperature Supercapacitors Based on SiC Nanowires

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202008901

Keywords

high temperature; nanowires; SiC; stability; supercapacitor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51672137, 51972178, 51702175]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Nature Science Foundation [LY20E020009]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [LQ17E020002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully prepared high-temperature supercapacitors based on SiC nanowires with enhanced capacitance through etching, demonstrating good stability and cycling performance at elevated temperatures.
Currently, the exploration of energy conversion/storage devices for high-temperature operation with desired stability is still a grand challenge. In the present work, the high-temperature supercapacitors (SCs) based on SiC nanowires as the electrode materials are reported, which are synthesized via pyrolysis of polymeric precursors followed by etching for creating more active sites with enhanced surface area. In 2.0 m KCl aqueous electrolyte, the as-fabricated electrode based on etched SiC nanowires delivers a specific capacitance of 23.6 mF cm(-2) (29.5 F g(-1)) at a current density of 0.2 mA cm(-2) (0.25 A g(-1)), which is approximate to 3.3 times to that of the counterpart without etching (7.19 mF cm(-2)). The as-constructed ionic-liquid-based SCs can endure the operation temperatures up to 150 degrees C with a capacitance retention of 80% for 10 000 cycles, which drops only approximate to 6% in comparison to that at 0 degrees C. Even under progressive variation in temperatures ranged between 0 and 150 degrees C, the capacitance retentions keep higher than 76% for 12 000 cycles, representing their promising to be serviced as robust SCs against high-temperature harsh conditions for energy storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available