4.7 Article

Highly Concentrated and Nonflammable Electrolyte for High Energy Density K-Based Dual-Ion Battery

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages 10202-10208

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c01993

Keywords

K-based dual-ion battery; concentrated electrolyte; nonflammable; cycling stability; high energy density

Funding

  1. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2019B090914003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51822210, 51972329]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Planning Project [JCYJ20170818153404696, JCYJ20170818153427106, JCYJ20180507182512042]
  4. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515110445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

K-based dual-ion batteries (K-DIBs) show the advantages of being cost-effective, high-voltage, and environmentally friendly; however, their energy density is restricted by limited intercalation capacity of anions at the graphite cathode and low electrolyte concentration. Herein, we developed a highly concentrated electrolyte system by dissolving 6.6 m potassium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (KFSI) into nonflammable trimethyl phosphate (TMP). Advantages exhibited by this concentrated KFSI/TMP electrolyte include (1) high oxidation potential (over 5.4 V) that improves -a the intercalation reversibility and capacity of FSI(- )anions at the graphite cathode side; (2) enhanced cycling performance of tin (Sn) foil anode; and (3) remarkably improved energy density of K-DIBs. With the concentrated electrolyte system, a proof-of-concept K-DIB constructed with a graphite cathode and a Sn foil anode displays a high specific discharge capacity of 93.6 mA h g(-1) at 300 mA g(-1) and energy density of similar to 144 W h kg(-1) (including electrode active materials and electrolytes), which are among the best results compared with previously reported K-DIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available