4.7 Article

Influence of Carrier Density and Energy Barrier Scattering on a High Seebeck Coefficient and Power Factor in Transparent Thermoelectric Copper Iodide

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages 10037-10044

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c01724

Keywords

thermoelectric; copper iodide (CuI); conductivity; Seebeck coefficient; power factor; X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS); transmission

Funding

  1. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand [C05X1802]
  2. JST Mirai Program, Japan [JPMJMI19A1]
  3. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C05X1802] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transparent thermoelectric materials offer a synergetic performance for energy harvesting as smart windows. Among them, p-type copper iodide (CuI) is preferred due to its low synthesis temperature, moderate conductivity and mobility, and high optical transparency. X-ray absorption spectroscopy results showed a pre-edge feature in the Cu 2p(3/2) spectrum, which suggested the presence of Cu-0-like defect states in gamma-CuI films. Interface and grain boundaries of CuI and Cu-0 act as a potential energy barrier for energy filtering of charge carriers, which along with the decrease in charge carrier density enhanced the Seebeck coefficient, alpha. The alpha value increased by 298% upon annealing at 100 degrees C, alpha = 789.5 mu VK-1, which resulted in a 480% increase in the power factor (alpha(2)sigma = 740.9 mu Wm(-1) K-2). Our results showed that a high Seebeck coefficient resulted from a decrease in charge carrier density and energy filtering of charge carriers at the interface and grain boundaries in optically transparent (T-visible similar to 60-85%) gamma-CuI films for energy harvesting as smart windows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available