Clinical Utility of a Phenotype-Enhanced MYH7 -Specific Variant Classification Framework in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genetic Testing
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Clinical Utility of a Phenotype-Enhanced
MYH7
-Specific Variant Classification Framework in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genetic Testing
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Circulation-Genomic and Precision Medicine
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 453-459
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Online
2020-09-08
DOI
10.1161/circgen.120.003039
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Assessment and Validation of a Phenotype-Enhanced Variant Classification Framework to Promote or Demote RYR2 Missense Variants of Uncertain Significance
- (2019) John R. Giudicessi et al. Circulation-Genomic and Precision Medicine
- Adaptation and validation of the ACMG/AMP variant classification framework for MYH7-associated inherited cardiomyopathies: recommendations by ClinGen’s Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel
- (2018) Melissa A Kelly et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG–AMP variant classification criteria
- (2017) Keith Nykamp et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium
- (2016) Laura M. Amendola et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Association of Arrhythmia-Related Genetic Variants With Phenotypes Documented in Electronic Medical Records
- (2016) Sara L. Van Driest et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Evaluation of the Mayo Clinic Phenotype-Based Genotype Predictor Score in Patients with Clinically Diagnosed Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- (2016) Sinead L. Murphy et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
- Results of clinical genetic testing of 2,912 probands with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: expanded panels offer limited additional sensitivity
- (2015) Ahmed A. Alfares et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology
- (2015) Sue Richards et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Genetic purgatory and the cardiac channelopathies: Exposing the variants of uncertain/unknown significance issue
- (2015) Michael J. Ackerman HEART RHYTHM
- New Perspectives on the Prevalence of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- (2015) Christopher Semsarian et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- The landscape of genetic variation in dilated cardiomyopathy as surveyed by clinical DNA sequencing
- (2014) Trevor J. Pugh et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Characterization of a Phenotype-Based Genetic Test Prediction Score for Unrelated Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- (2014) J. Martijn Bos et al. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
- Distinguishing Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-Associated Mutations from Background Genetic Noise
- (2014) Jamie D. Kapplinger et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
- Clinical predictors of genetic testing outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- (2013) Jodie Ingles et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Toronto Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genotype Score for Prediction of a Positive Genotype in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- (2012) Christiane Gruner et al. Circulation-Cardiovascular Genetics
- Myofilament Protein Gene Mutation Screening and Outcome of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- (2012) Iacopo Olivotto et al. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
- HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the State of Genetic Testing for the Channelopathies and Cardiomyopathies
- (2011) Michael J. Ackerman et al. HEART RHYTHM
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started