4.5 Article

Diversity of Olfactory Responses and Skills in Astyanax Mexicanus Cavefish Populations Inhabiting different Caves

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d12100395

Keywords

fieldwork; wild fish; comparative biology; behavior; troglomorphism; olfactory test; infrared movies; amino acids; chondroitin; plasticity

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. ANR (Agence Nationale pour la Recherche) grant [BLINDTEST]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale Equipe FRM grant [DEQ20150331745]
  4. French-Mexican Ecos-Nord Exchange Program [M15A03]
  5. Patricia-Ornelas Garcia (UNAM, Mexico)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animals in many phyla are adapted to and thrive in the constant darkness of subterranean environments. To do so, cave animals have presumably evolved mechano- and chemosensory compensations to the loss of vision, as is the case for the blind characiform cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus. Here, we systematically assessed the olfactory capacities of cavefish and surface fish of this species in the lab as well as in the wild, in five different caves in northeastern Mexico, using an olfactory setup specially developed to test and record olfactory responses during fieldwork. Overall cavefish showed lower (i.e., better) olfactory detection thresholds than surface fish. However, wild adult cavefish from the Pachon, Sabinos, Tinaja, Chica and Subterraneo caves showed highly variable responses to the three different odorant molecules they were exposed to. Pachon and Subterraneo cavefish showed the highest olfactory capacities, and Chica cavefish showed no response to the odors presented. We discuss these data with regard to the environmental conditions in which these different cavefish populations live. Our experiments in natural settings document the diversity of cave environments inhabited by a single species of cavefish, A. mexicanus, and highlight the complexity of the plastic and genetic mechanisms that underlie cave adaptation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available