4.7 Article

In Vitro Starch Digestibility and Glycaemic Index of Fried Dough and Batter Enriched with Wheat and Oat Bran

Journal

FOODS
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods9101374

Keywords

in vitro assay; glycaemic index; bran; digestible starch; fried dough; magwinya

Funding

  1. Technology Innovation Agency, South Africa [SARDF/16/FST/03]
  2. Directorate of Research and Innovation [SARDF/17/FST/03]
  3. DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Food Security SMART Foods Project [160201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A deep-fried dough/batter food (magwinya) consumed across different age groups and social strata in South Africa was investigated in this study for digestibility and estimated glycaemic index (eGI). In this research, we investigated the influence of bran type-wheat bran (WB) and oat bran (OB), and concentration (0-20% w/w) on the starch digestibility and eGI of magwinya. Rapidly available glucose (RAG) of control fried dough (60.31 g/100 g) was 33% less than fried batter (90.07 g/100 g). There was a significant reduction in RAG and an increase in slowly available (SAG) and unavailable glucose (UG) content of the fried products with OB and WB addition. The highest SAG content was observed in WB fried dough. Control fried batter had the highest eGI value (80.02) and control fried dough had medium eGI value (58.11). WB fried dough, fried batter, and OB fried dough were categorised as medium GI foods at eGI range of 56.46-58.39, 65.93-68.84 and 56.34-57.27, respectively. The eGI values of OB fried batter ranged from 73.57 to 80.03 and were thus classified as high GI foods. UG showed significant correlation with eGI (r = -0.892, -0.973, p < 0.01) and fat content (r = -0.590, -0.661, p < 0.01) for WB and OB fried products. These results reveal that ingredient modification through bran enrichment is effective for the regulation of starch digestion and reduction of eGI of deep-fried dough/batter foods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available