4.6 Article

Automated image analysis for quantification of filamentous bacteria

Journal

BMC MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0583-5

Keywords

Morphology; Antibiotic-induced filamentation; Digital microscopy; Time-lapse imaging; Cell elongation; Escherichia coli

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish National Innovation Foundation [137-2012]
  2. Danish Agency for Science [4005-00204B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Antibiotics of the beta-lactam group are able to alter the shape of the bacterial cell wall, e.g. filamentation or a spheroplast formation. Early determination of antimicrobial susceptibility may be complicated by filamentation of bacteria as this can be falsely interpreted as growth in systems relying on colorimetry or turbidometry (such as Vitek-2, Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway). The objective was to examine an automated image analysis algorithm for quantification of filamentous bacteria using the 3D digital microscopy imaging system, oCelloScope. Results: Three E. coli strains displaying different resistant profiles and differences in filamentation kinetics were used to study a novel image analysis algorithm to quantify length of bacteria and bacterial filamentation. A total of 12 beta-lactam antibiotics or beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations were analyzed for their ability to induce filamentation. Filamentation peaked at approximately 120 min with an average cell length of 30 mu m. Conclusion: The automated image analysis algorithm showed a clear ability to rapidly detect and quantify beta-lactam-induced filamentation in E. coli. This rapid determination of beta-lactam-mediated morphological alterations may facilitate future development of fast and accurate AST systems, which in turn will enable early targeted antimicrobial therapy. Therefore, rapid detection of beta-lactam-mediated morphological changes may have important clinical implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available