4.6 Review

Systemic Reprogramming of Monocytes in Cancer

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01399

Keywords

classical monocyte; cancer; tumor; monocyte reprogramming; tumor-educated monocytes; hematopoiesis; monopoiesis; peripheral blood

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [1S23316N]
  2. Kom op Tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer), the Flemish Cancer Society
  3. FWO-NAFOSTED [G0F3616N]
  4. Kom op Tegen Kanker
  5. Stichting Tegen Kanker
  6. FWO
  7. Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monocytes influence multiple aspects of tumor progression, including antitumor immunity, angiogenesis, and metastasis, primarily by infiltrating tumors, and differentiating into tumor-associated macrophages. Emerging evidence suggests that the tumor-induced systemic environment influences the development and phenotype of monocytes before their arrival to the tumor site. As a result, circulating monocytes show functional alterations in cancer, such as the acquisition of immunosuppressive activity and reduced responsiveness to inflammatory stimuli. In this review, we summarize available evidence about cancer-induced changes in monopoiesis and its impact on the abundance and function of monocytes in the periphery. In addition, we describe the phenotypical alterations observed in tumor-educated peripheral blood monocytes and highlight crucial gaps in our knowledge about additional cellular functions that may be affected based on transcriptomic studies. We also highlight emerging therapeutic strategies that aim to reverse cancer-induced changes in monopoiesis and peripheral monocytes to inhibit tumor progression and improve therapy responses. Overall, we suggest that an in-depth understanding of systemic monocyte reprogramming will have implications for cancer immunotherapy and the development of clinical biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available