4.7 Review

Antigen processing and presentation in cancer immunotherapy

Journal

JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001111

Keywords

antigen presentation; antigens; antigens; neoplasm; T-lymphocytes; immunotherapy

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [ZIA-DC00008]
  2. NIH
  3. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (DDCF) [2014194]
  4. American Association for Dental Research
  5. Colgate-Palmolive Company
  6. Genentech
  7. Elsevier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Knowledge about and identification of T cell tumor antigens may inform the development of T cell receptor-engineered adoptive cell transfer or personalized cancer vaccine immunotherapy. Here, we review antigen processing and presentation and discuss limitations in tumor antigen prediction approaches. Methods Original articles covering antigen processing and presentation, epitope discovery, and in silico T cell epitope prediction were reviewed. Results Natural processing and presentation of antigens is a complex process that involves proteasomal proteolysis of parental proteins, transportation of digested peptides into the endoplasmic reticulum, loading of peptides onto major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules, and shuttling of peptide:MHC complexes to the cell surface. A number of T cell tumor antigens have been experimentally validated in patients with cancer. Assessment of predicted MHC class I binding and total score for these validated T cell antigens demonstrated a wide range of values, with nearly one-third of validated antigens carrying an IC(50)of greater than 500 nM. Conclusions Antigen processing and presentation is a complex, multistep process. In silico epitope prediction techniques can be a useful tool, but comprehensive experimental testing and validation on a patient-by-patient basis may be required to reliably identify T cell tumor antigens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available