4.5 Article

Modifying bacterial flagellin to evade Nod-like Receptor CARD 4 recognition enhances protective immunity against Salmonella

Journal

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 1588-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-00801-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/H003916/1, BB/K006436/1]
  2. Zoetis UK [BB/K006436/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust [108045/Z/15/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. BBSRC [BB/H003916/1, BB/K006436/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, the authors show that Salmonella activates the cytosolic PRR Nod-like Receptor CARD 4 (NLRC4), which limits adaptive T-cell responses in a NLRP3-dependent manner. Modification of Salmonella flagellin reduces NLRC4 activation and enhances protective immunity. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed in antigen-presenting cells are thought to shape pathogen-specific immunity by inducing secretion of costimulatory cytokines during T-cell activation, yet data to support this notion in vivo are scarce. Here, we show that the cytosolic PRR Nod-like Receptor CARD 4 (NLRC4) suppresses, rather than facilitates, effector and memory CD4(+) T-cell responses against Salmonella in mice. NLRC4 negatively regulates immunological memory by preventing delayed activation of the cytosolic PRR NLR pyrin domain 3 (NLRP3) that would otherwise amplify the production of cytokines important for the generation of Th1 immunity such as intereukin-18. Consistent with a role for NLRC4 in memory immunity, primary challenge with Salmonella expressing flagellin modified to largely evade NLRC4 recognition notably increases protection against lethal rechallenge. This finding suggests flagellin modification to reduce NLRC4 activation enhances protective immunity, which could have important implications for vaccine development against flagellated microbial pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available