4.4 Review

Current indications for pegging in the anophthalmic socket: are there any?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 465-473

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000297

Keywords

anophthalmos; enucleation; evisceration; implant pegging; orbital implants; pegging

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewTo highlight the development, problems, and current status of coupling porous orbital implants to the overlying prosthetic eye.Recent findingsAlthough increasing the risk of complications, pegging significantly contributes to prosthesis motility and satisfies the cosmetic expectations of some patients. Patients should be counseled regarding the increased risks in approximately one-third of individuals and that complications can occur even 10 years following implantation.SummaryAlthough implant peg placement has declined dramatically over the past decade, a precise and meticulous technique under intravenous anesthesia in the appropriately selected patient can be a successful outpatient procedure. Fortunately, most problems are of a minor nature, and over 85% of patients are able to retain their pegs following proper management and timely intervention. Additional visits to the ophthalmic plastic surgeon or ocularist are required that may not be necessary if a peg had not been placed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available