4.6 Article

Detection and Quantification of Cracking in Concrete Aggregate through Virtual Data Fusion of X-Ray Computed Tomography Images

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 13, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma13183921

Keywords

X-ray computed tomography (CT); concrete; alkali-silica reaction (ASR); ASR-sensitive aggregate; solubility test; specific surface area; crack detection; automated image processing; damage quantification

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure [06.0108/2014/BRB]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, which is part of a larger research program, a framework called virtual data fusion was developed to provide an automated and consistent crack detection method that allows for the cross-comparison of results from large quantities of X-ray computed tomography (CT) data. A partial implementation of this method in a custom program was developed for use in research focused on crack quantification in alkali-silica reaction (ASR)-sensitive concrete aggregates. During the CT image processing, a series of image analyses tailored for detecting specific, individual crack-like characteristics were completed. The results of these analyses were then fused in order to identify crack-like objects within the images with much higher accuracy than that yielded by any individual image analysis procedure. The results of this strategy demonstrated the success of the program in effectively identifying crack-like structures and quantifying characteristics, such as surface area and volume. The results demonstrated that the source of aggregate has a very significant impact on the amount of internal cracking, even when the mineralogical characteristics remain very similar. River gravels, for instance, were found to contain significantly higher levels of internal cracking than quarried stone aggregates of the same mineralogical type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available