4.8 Review

Interfaces in Garnet-Based All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 10, Issue 39, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202001318

Keywords

all-solid-state lithium batteries; garnet electrolytes; interfaces; mechanical degradation

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0905400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702376, 21905057, 21935009]
  3. National Thousand Youth Talents Project of the Chinese Government
  4. Guangdong Pearl River Talents Plan [2019QN01L117]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [19lgzd02]
  6. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21905314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) are considered to be the next-generation energy storage system, because of their overwhelming advantages in energy density and safety compared to conventional lithium ion batteries. Among various systems, garnet-based ASSLBs are one of the most promising candidates. The advantages arise from the intrinsic properties of garnet electrolytes, especially the high shear modulus and wider electrochemical window compared to that of polymer and sulfide electrolytes, guaranteeing the application of Li metal and high voltage cathodes. However, the interfacial issues between garnets and electrodes (Li metal and cathodes) are challenging and hinder the further development of garnet-based ASSLBs. Herein, the origin of interfacial resistance and recent development of interfacial construction in garnet-based ASSLBs are reviewed, as well as the subsequent interfacial degradation and cell failure during cycling process, including inhomogeneous plating and stripping, Li dendrites, and strain induced microcracks in stiff electrodes. Finally, the future challenges and opportunities in this important and exciting field are also presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available