4.5 Review

How far have we come? A review of MPA network performance indicators in reaching qualitative elements of Aichi Target 11

Journal

CONSERVATION LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12746

Keywords

conservation policy; conservation strategies; monitoring and evaluation; multidisciplinary; social-ecological conservation

Funding

  1. CanadianHealthy Oceans Network
  2. Natural Sciences and EngineeringResearch Council of Canada
  3. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  4. INREST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effective networks of marine protected areas (MPAs) are explicitly recognized and called for in international biodiversity conservation strategies such as the Aichi Targets. While various indicators have been proposed to assess effectiveness of individual MPAs, no comprehensive set of indicators exists for MPA networks, particularly for Aichi Target 11. The qualitative elements of this target recognize the value of social, economic, governance, and ecological factors in achieving effective biodiversity conservation. Here, we used a systematic literature review to identify indicators of MPA network effectiveness. We reviewed 64 publications, identifying 48 indicators that could be aligned with the qualitative elements. Results showed that assessments of MPA network effectiveness predominantly focused on effective management while neglecting equitable management and integration into the wider land and seascape. Indicators tended to focus on ecological characteristics, overlooking social, economic, and governance dimensions. Key challenges in addressing these gaps include identifying conflicting priorities and objectives in adjacent marine and land areas that interfere with cooperation and knowledge sharing, and ensuring diverse areas with distinct social and ecological contexts are considered. This study provides the first review of indicators for assessing MPA networks and adds to the literature assessing whether current and future targets can be met.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Marine protected areas' positive effect on fish biomass persists across the steep climatic gradient of the Mediterranean Sea

Ori Frid, Shahar Malamud, Antonio Di Franco, Paolo Guidetti, Ernesto Azzurro, Joachim Claudet, Fiorenza Micheli, Ruth Yahel, Enric Sala, Jonathan Belmaker

Summary: The positive effect of fully protected marine protected areas (MPAs) on marine biodiversity, and specifically on fishes, has been widely documented. The potential of MPAs to mitigate the impact of adverse climatic conditions has seldom been investigated. This study assessed the effectiveness of MPAs in increasing fish biomass across the Mediterranean Sea and found that while MPAs did increase fish biomass, higher seawater temperatures were associated with decreased fish biomass. Importantly, the rate of decrease in fish biomass with temperature was similar between protected and fished sites.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2023)

Editorial Material Ecology

Making marine biotechnology work for people and nature

Robert Blasiak, Jean-Baptiste Jouffray, Diva J. J. Amon, Joachim Claudet, Paul Dunshirn, Peter Sogaard Jorgensen, Agnes Pranindita, Colette C. C. Wabnitz, Erik Zhivkoplias, Henrik Oesterblom

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2023)

Article Environmental Studies

Guidance on marine protected area protection level assignments when faced with unknown regulatory information

Alex Driedger, Jennifer Sletten, Claire Colegrove, Timothe Vincent, Virgil Zetterlind, Joachim Claudet, Barbara Horta e Costa

Summary: Strong human use regulations are crucial for the effectiveness of marine protected areas (MPAs). In this study, the authors explore the classification of MPAs based on their protection levels using the regulation-based classification system (RBCS). They found that using readily available information and contextual indicators can reliably identify fully and highly protected areas, even in the absence of complete regulatory information.

MARINE POLICY (2023)

Article Development Studies

Strategic use of ecosystem services and co-benefits for Sustainable Development Goals

Rachel E. Bitoun, Gilbert David, Rodolphe Devillers

Summary: This study analyzes the challenges and opportunities of sustainability in three European outermost regions and proposes strategies using ecosystem services assessments to address these challenges. The study uses SWOT and PESTEL analysis, and identifies seven implementation strategies through interviews and matrix analysis. The results indicate that these strategies contribute to achieving multiple sustainable development goals.

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (2023)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

Making protected areas in the high seas count

Joachim Claudet, Cassandra M. Brooks, Robert Blasiak

SCIENCE (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Effects of management objectives and rules on marine conservation outcomes

Natalie C. Ban, Emily S. Darling, Georgina G. Gurney, Whitney Friedman, Stacy D. Jupiter, W. Peni Lestari, Irfan Yulianto, Sinta Pardede, Sukma A. R. Tarigan, Puji Prihatiningsih, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Waisea Naisilisili, Sirilo Dulunaqio, Josheena Naggea, Ravaka Ranaivoson, Vera N. Agostini, Gabby Ahmadia, Jessica Blythe, Stuart J. Campbell, Joachim Claudet, Courtney Cox, Graham Epstein, Margaret Estradivari, Margaret Fox, David Gill, Amber Himes-Cornell, Harry Jonas, Elizabeth Mcleod, Nyawira A. Muthiga, Tim McClanahan

Summary: Understanding the effectiveness and enabling conditions of different area-based management tools is crucial for supporting biodiversity conservation efforts. Although different types of management can be effective, most managed areas do not meet effectiveness criteria. This highlights the importance of strong management and governance of managed areas and the need to measure ecological impact.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Fisheries outcomes of marine protected area networks: Levels of protection, connectivity, and time matter

Charlotte Seve, Mokrane Belharet, Paco Melia, Antonio Di Franco, Antonio Calo, Joachim Claudet

Summary: This study assesses the effects of different management policies on conservation and fisheries outcomes using a model. The results show that spatial management is more effective than nonspatial management, and conservation and fisheries outcomes increase with increasing levels of protection. Areas connected through larval dispersal between MPAs have higher fisheries outcomes, but catch increases are preceded by a short-term decrease.

CONSERVATION LETTERS (2023)

Biographical-Item Ecology

Robert L. Pressey (1953-2023)

Vanessa M. Adams, Jorge G. Alvarez-Romero, Natalie C. Ban, Morena Mills, Piero Visconti

Summary: This sentence describes a person who is a leading conservation planner and advocate for biodiversity.

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2023)

Article Environmental Sciences

Existing evidence on the impact of changes in marine ecosystem structure and functioning on ecosystem service delivery: a systematic map

Carole Sylvie Campagne, Laurie-Anne Roy, Joseph Langridge, Joachim Claudet, Remi Mongruel, Damien Beillouin, Eric Thiebaut

Summary: This study constructed a systematic map to summarize the existing literature on how changes in marine ecosystems influence the provision of marine ecosystem services (ES). The findings showed that the most studied ecosystems were pelagic ecosystems on continental shelves and intertidal ecosystems, and food provision was the major focus of ES articles across all types of marine ecosystems.

ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Striking a balance between ecological, economic, governance, and social dimensions in marine protected area network evaluations

Mairi C. Meehan, Gerald G. Singh, Natalie C. Ban, Rodolphe Devillers, Joachim Claudet

Summary: This article explores the role of Marine Protected Area Networks (MPANs) in protecting biodiversity and contributing to sustainable development, emphasizing the importance of considering ecological, economic, governance, and social dimensions in MPAN design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. The study found that most MPANs have multiple co-occurring, potentially conflicting objectives. MPANs with both biodiversity and societal objectives consider attributes across all dimensions more frequently than those with only biodiversity objectives. However, ecological attributes are always perceived as important regardless of the MPAN objective. Overlooking dimensions in MPAN evaluations can hinder achieving synergies between the multiple dimensions. Identifying important attributes considered in MPANs can enhance the practice of MPAN design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation and improve MPAN success.

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2023)

Article Environmental Studies

Conservation ready marine spatial planning

Julie M. Reimer, Rodolphe Devillers, Brice Trouillet, Natalie C. Ban, Tundi Agardy, Joachim Claudet

Summary: Marine spatial planning (MSP) often prioritizes blue growth objectives over biodiversity conservation, but this study suggests the concept of conservation ready MSP, where plans are designed to integrate conservation in MSP to support sustained ocean use. Qualitative document analysis identified five themes, reflecting conservation in MSP from weak to strong inclusion. The analysis suggests that while some plans appear more prepared to integrate conservation, overall the prioritization of managing impacts and conservation in MSP is less apparent.

MARINE POLICY (2023)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Triple exposure: Reducing negative impacts of climate change, blue growth, and conservation on coastal communities

David A. Gill, Jessica Blythe, Nathan Bennett, Louisa Evans, Katrina Brown, Rachel A. Turner, Jacopo A. Baggio, Dana Baker, Natalie C. Ban, Victor Brun, Joachim Claudet, Emily Darling, Antonio Di Franco, Estradivari, Graham Epstein, Noella J. Gray, Georgina G. Gurney, Rebecca P. Horan, Stacy D. Jupiter, Jacqueline D. Lau, Natali Lazzari, Peni Lestari, Shauna L. Mahajan, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Josheena Naggea, Elizabeth R. Selig, Charlotte K. Whitney, Noelia Zafra-Calvo, Nyawira A. Muthiga

Summary: Coastal communities face a triple exposure scenario due to the accelerating global change drivers of climate change, blue growth, and expansion of area-based conservation. Efforts to maximize social benefits can be hindered by external processes that amplify vulnerabilities and inequalities. Prioritizing social justice and building resilience is crucial for achieving climate, economic, and conservation goals. Implementors should address root causes of vulnerability, use participatory systems approaches, and foster inclusive partnerships for collaborative design and implementation in order to support well-being, justice, and resilience in coastal communities.

ONE EARTH (2023)

No Data Available