4.6 Review

Primary Prevention Trial Designs Using Coronary Imaging

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 1454-1465

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.06.042

Keywords

coronary; prevention; trials; calcium

Funding

  1. Food and Drug Administration, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Aetna Foundation
  2. Amgen Foundation
  3. Amgen Inc.
  4. GE Healthcare
  5. Katz Academy of Translational Research
  6. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  7. Fonds de Recherche Quebec-Sante
  8. Doggone Foundation
  9. Amgen
  10. Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  11. HLS Therapeutics
  12. Boehringer Ingelheim

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is considered a useful test for enhancing risk assessment, particularly in middle-aged adults. While further evidence to support current guideline recommendations for CAC in this group is likely to come from ongoing trials, innovative trial designs across the lifespan are being strongly considered for future research. This includes the potential benefit of an opportunistic screening strategy using artificial intelligence. Inclusion of diverse participants, particularly in the United States, could enhance the potential impact of future CAC trials.
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is considered a useful test for enhancing risk assessment in the primary prevention setting. Clinical trials are under consideration. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a multidisciplinary working group on August 26 to 27, 2019, in Bethesda, Maryland, to review available evidence and consider the appropriateness of conducting further research on coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing, or other coronary imaging studies, as a way of informing decisions for primary preventive treatments for cardiovascular disease. The working group concluded that additional evidence to support current guideline recommendations for use of CAC in middle-age adults is very likely to come from currently ongoing trials in that age group, and a new trial is not likely to be timely or cost effective. The current trials will not, however, address the role of CAC testing in younger adults or older adults, who are also not addressed in existing guidelines, nor will existing trials address the potential benefit of an opportunistic screening strategy made feasible by the application of artificial intelligence. Innovative trial designs for testing the value of CAC across the lifespan were strongly considered and represent important opportunities for additional research, particularly those that leverage existing trials or other real-world data streams including clinical computed tomography scans. Sex and racial/ethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality, and inclusion of diverse participants in future CAC trials, particularly those based in the United States, would enhance the potential impact of these studies. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2021;14:1454-65) (c) 2021 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available