4.6 Article

Configuring Supply Chain Dyads for Regulatory Disruptions: A Behavioral Study of Scenarios

Journal

PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 1014-1033

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/poms.13290

Keywords

behavioral study; public policy; collaborative scenario planning; supply chain configuration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of scenario planning in supply chain disruptions due to regulatory changes, highlighting the differences between dyadic scenario creation and traditional scenario creation, as well as addressing scenarios of regulatory disruptions. Most hypotheses are supported in the study, leading to the proposal of a Supply Chain Regulation Preparedness framework.
This study examines the use of scenario planning-a strategic planning tool used for making decisions of long-term nature-to adapt a buyer-supplier dyad for disruptions in their supply chain resulting from abrupt changes in regulations. We posit that dyadic scenarios, that is, those created jointly by a buyer and a supplier, alter the scope of supply chain design in relation to a regulatory disruption. We offer four hypotheses distinguishing dyadic scenario creation from the traditional single-firm scenario creation and two additional hypotheses related specifically to scenarios of regulatory disruptions. Five of the six hypotheses are supported in a behavioral study of a regulatory context. We integrate these findings to propose a Supply Chain Regulation Preparedness (SRP) framework for assessing the effects of dyadic scenario creation in six regimens of regulatory disruptions. We discuss the implications of this framework for the theory and practice of organizational learning associated with supply chain configurations in the face of emergent public policies and highlight collaborative scenario planning as an emergent strategic-level mechanism that supply chain partners can deploy jointly to address just-in-case uncertainties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available