4.5 Article

Quotation errors in general science journals

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0538

Keywords

references; quotation errors; substantiation of claims; bibliometrics; research ethics; quotation accuracy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the incremental nature of scientific discovery, scientific writing requires extensive referencing to the writings of others. The accuracy of this referencing is vital, yet errors do occur. These errors are called 'quotation errors'. This paper presents the first assessment of quotation errors in high-impact general science journals. A total of 250 random citations were examined. The propositions being cited were compared with the referenced materials to verify whether the propositions could be substantiated by those materials. The study found a total error rate of 25%. This result tracks well with error rates found in similar studies in other academic fields. Additionally, several suggestions are offered that may help to decrease these errors and make similar studies more feasible in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Unverified history: an analysis of quotation accuracy in leading history journals

Aaron Cumberledge, Neal Smith Jr, Benjamin W. Riley

Summary: The accurate use of references is crucial in academic pursuit of truth, but previous studies show that approximately 25% of references in many academic journals do not support the claims they are cited for. This paper examines quotation errors in history journals and finds an error rate of 24.27% when comparing articles with their references. However, due to challenges posed by citation conventions in history journals, the actual prevalence of errors is likely underestimated. The paper also offers potential methods for reducing errors and improving future quotation error reviews.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2023)

No Data Available