- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Causal inference in genetic trio studies
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Volume 117, Issue 39, Pages 24117-24126
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Online
2020-09-19
DOI
10.1073/pnas.2007743117
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software
- (2020) Claude Renaux et al. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS
- Metropolized Knockoff Sampling
- (2020) Stephen Bates et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Multi-resolution localization of causal variants across the genome
- (2020) Matteo Sesia et al. Nature Communications
- Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder
- (2019) Jakob Grove et al. NATURE GENETICS
- OUP accepted manuscript
- (2018) BIOMETRIKA
- Panning for gold: ‘model-X’ knockoffs for high dimensional controlled variable selection
- (2018) Emmanuel Candès et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY
- Mixed-model association for biobank-scale datasets
- (2018) Po-Ru Loh et al. NATURE GENETICS
- The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data
- (2018) Clare Bycroft et al. NATURE
- Rejoinder: ‘Gene hunting with hidden Markov model knockoffs’
- (2018) M Sesia et al. BIOMETRIKA
- Accumulation Tests for FDR Control in Ordered Hypothesis Testing
- (2017) Ang Li et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Refined genetic maps reveal sexual dimorphism in human meiotic recombination at multiple scales
- (2017) Claude Bhérer et al. Nature Communications
- Gene Mapping in Admixed Families: A Cautionary Note on the Interpretation of the Transmission Disequilibrium Test and a Possible Solution
- (2016) Xuexia Wang et al. HUMAN HEREDITY
- Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffs
- (2015) Rina Foygel Barber et al. ANNALS OF STATISTICS
- The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder
- (2014) Ivan Iossifov et al. NATURE
- Most genetic risk for autism resides with common variation
- (2014) Trent Gaugler et al. NATURE GENETICS
- A General Approach for Haplotype Phasing across the Full Spectrum of Relatedness
- (2014) Jared O'Connell et al. PLoS Genetics
- NCBI’s Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: dbGaP
- (2013) Kimberly A. Tryka et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders
- (2012) Richard Anney et al. HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
- The Autism Sequencing Consortium: Large-Scale, High-Throughput Sequencing in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- (2012) Joseph D. Buxbaum et al. NEURON
- Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies
- (2011) Jurg Ott et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Haplotype phasing: existing methods and new developments
- (2011) Sharon R. Browning et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Do common variants play a role in risk for autism? Evidence and theoretical musings
- (2010) Bernie Devlin et al. BRAIN RESEARCH
- Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies
- (2010) Hyun Min Kang et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing
- (2010) Kathryn Roeder et al. STATISTICAL SCIENCE
- The Role of Family-Based Designs in Genome-Wide Association Studies
- (2010) Nan M. Laird et al. STATISTICAL SCIENCE
- Estimating high-dimensional intervention effects from observational data
- (2009) Marloes H. Maathuis et al. ANNALS OF STATISTICS
- FBAT-SNP-PC: An Approach for Multiple Markers and Single Trait in Family-Based Association Tests
- (2008) Cyril S. Rakovski et al. HUMAN HEREDITY
- Haplotype Mapping of a Diploid Non-Meiotic Organism Using Existing and Induced Aneuploidies
- (2007) Melanie Legrand et al. PLoS Genetics
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started