Peer reviews. A peer reviewer’s view

Problem with p values: why p values do not tell you if your treatment is likely to work

(2019) Robert Price et al.   POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL

The normal range: it is not normal and it is not a range

(2018) Martin Brunel Whyte et al.   POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL

Fake peer review - too good to be true

(2017) Bernard M Y Cheung   POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL

The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature

(2017) Serge P. J. M. Horbach et al.   PLoS One

Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview

(2016) Xingshun Qi et al.   POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL

Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study

(2014) Akira Onishi et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age

(2012) Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas et al.   JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature

(2012) Michael L. Grieneisen et al.   PLoS One