Journal
PHYCOLOGIA
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 449-455Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00318884.2020.1800298
Keywords
Australia; Morpho-anatomy; psbA; rbcL; Type specimens
Categories
Funding
- Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology at the University of the Western Cape
- South African National Research Foundation (NRF)
- South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), through its Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme (FBIP)
- National Taxonomy Research Grant Program (NTRGP) [RG19-35]
- Department of the Environment and Energy of the Australian Government, through the Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Two of the four currently recognised species ofPhymatolithonin South Africa areP. repandum(type locality: Half Moon Bay, Port Philip Bay, Victoria, Australia) andP. ferox(type locality: Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa). PartialrbcL sequences of the lectotype ofP. repandumand the holotype ofP. feroxdemonstrate that the former is not present in South Africa and does not belong inPhymatolithon, whereas the latter belongs inPhymatolithon, but that the name has been misapplied in South Africa. The correct name for the species, currently calledP. repandumin South Africa, isP. ferox. PartialrbcL andpsbA sequences of two of the current heterotypic synonyms ofP. ferox, Lithothamnion prolixumandLithothamnion prolixumf.plicatum, show that they are conspecific and do not belong inPhymatolithon. Lithothamnion prolixumis the basionym for the species currently, but incorrectly, calledP. feroxin South Africa.Phymatolithon repandumandL. prolixumbelong in an as yet undescribed genus. All heterotypic synonyms of currently recognised names of non-geniculate corallines that were placed in synonymy based on morpho-anatomy should not be accepted until confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available